Dignity & Worth (pt. 2)

20200701_215211And he had to pass through Samaria. 

– John 4:4

If we don’t understand first century Jewish customs, we might miss the significance of this verse and of Jesus’ actions described in John 4:1-45. John tells us that he had to pass through Samaria. This was not just a geographical “had to”, but a missional “had to”. The usual route from Judea to Galilee was through Samaria, but often Jews, seeking to preserve their purity and avoid defilement, bypassed this half-Jew half Gentile region. In addition to this religious segregation, there was historical animosity between Jews and Samaritans that fueled intense social segregation Next, John recorded Jesus’ interaction with a Samaritan woman at a well in Sychar. He was thirsty and she was there to draw water at the sixth hour or around noon. Normally, women would draw water in the cooler parts of the day – morning or sunset. This woman was there during the hottest part of the day. Why? Later on in this chapter, we find out that she is an immoral woman having had five husbands and currently living with a man who wasn’t her husband (John 4:16-18). Such immorality made her the target of hostility among other women, so she draws water at a time of day when no one was around. She didn’t want to be constantly shamed by her peers for her immoral lifestyle.

Considering the social customs of the day, Jesus’ actions were questionable, if not scandalous. First, he intentionally went to an area that law abiding Jews avoided and he asked a Samaritan for something to drink. Second, he was speaking to a woman in public, which was not what rabbis of that day did. Third, he was speaking to an immoral woman. Normally, publicly associating with an immoral woman would jeopardize a man’s name and reputation. In his discourse with this woman, Jesus intentionally bypassed all of the socially accepted norms to see this woman become a citizen of heaven and no longer an outcast of Samaria. He bypassed ethnic impartiality, sexism, religion and self-preservation to introduce the Samaritan woman to the Messiah – to himself (John 4:25-26). Consider for a moment how this woman must have felt initially. We can see from the text that she knew this interaction wasn’t normal (John 4:9). Even Jesus’ disciples knew this wasn’t normal (John 4:27). After her interaction with Jesus, she goes back to her town to testify of the Messiah and many believed in Jesus on the account of her testimony (John 4:29,39).

We should not miss the placement of this passage in John’s gospel account. In chapter 3, Jesus tells Nicodemus, a leading Pharisee, that a person must be born again to enter the kingdom, which happens by the regenerating work of the Spirit (John 3:1-8). That work of the Spirit is inextricably tied to belief in the Son, whom God sent into the world for salvation as an act of love for everyone who believes (John 3:16-21).

I wonder how Nicodemus heard “everyone” considering how some Jews despised Gentiles (non-Jews) and didn’t believe Gentiles had a share in God’s kingdom. It is no accident that John places this account of the Samaritan woman at the well on the heels of Jesus’ salvation explanation to one of Israel’s elite religious teachers. Though salvation is from the Jews, clearly it is not solely for the Jews. Redemption is for everyone who believes irrespective of ethnicity, language, skin color, culture or gender. It has always been God’s plan to gather a multi-ethnic, multilingual and multicultural people into His kingdom. Consider a few verses from Scripture-

  • Genesis 12:1-3 – Abraham would become a great nation and in him all the families of the earth shall be blessed.

  • Joshua 2:1-13 – Rahab, a Gentile prostitute, trusts in the LORD.

  • 1 Kings 17:8-24 – The LORD sent Elijah to Zarephath in Sidon (a Gentile city) to a widow and her son to bear witness of himself as the God who gives daily bread and the God who raises the dead (Gentile resurrection).

  • Psalm 22:27-28 – David prophesies that the nations would turn to the LORD and worship him.

  • Psalm 67 – A call for the nations to worship and praise God.

  • Psalm 86:9 – David foresees a day when the nations will worship and glorify God.

  • Isaiah 2:1-4 – Isaiah had a vision that the nations would go to the house of the LORD (new Jerusalem in the NH/NE).

  • Isaiah 42:1-9 & Isaiah 49:1-7 – The LORD’s servant will be given as a covenant and light to the nations.

  • Isaiah 66:18-23 – After the final judgment, the new creation will be inhabited by people from the nations.

  • Micah 4:1-5 Zion, the mountain of the LORD (place of worship – Jerusalem) will be re-established and people from many nations will flock to worship God and submit to the Law of God.

  • Matthew 28:18-20 – Jesus commissions His disciples to go make disciples of all nations.

  • Luke 24:44-47 – Jesus’ post-resurrection teaching his disciples that He is the fulfillment of Scripture and the gospel should be proclaimed to all nations.

  • Acts 1:6-8 – Just before His ascension, Jesus reiterated to his disciples the necessity of the gospel to reach the ends of the earth.

  • Acts 9:10-16 – Jesus tells Ananias to lay hands on Paul to restore his sight and that Paul would carry Jesus’ name to Gentiles, to kings and to Israel.

  • Acts 10 – Through a vision, Peter understands that God shows no partiality when it comes to salvation by grace through faith in the gospel. Many Gentiles hear the gospel, believe and the Holy Spirit is poured out on them.

  • Acts 17:22-27 – In Athens, Paul declares God being the creator of every nation from one man and sovereignly placing them where he did that they might call on his name.

  • The Pauline Epistles are addressed to predominantly Gentile churches.

  • Revelation 5:8-10; 7:9 – The kingdom of God is composed of multi-ethnic, multicultural and multilingual people.

Through Jesus, God redeems a very diverse group of people to be in His eternal kingdom. The promise made to Abraham, being the father of many nations, is ultimately fulfilled in Christ! Paul explains this in Galatians 3 by saying the sons or descendants of Abraham are those who have the faith of Abraham, which is the qualifier for entrance into the kingdom. Our ethnicities, nationalities, genders nor our societal positions are no longer to be issues of division because the gospel has united believers as family in Christ. In Ephesians 2:11-22, Paul taught that the dividing wall of hostility between Jews and Gentiles has been torn down as the gospel created one new man. This one new man, though diverse ethnically, makes up the unified people of God. The mystery that Gentiles are fellow heirs and citizens with the saints and members of the household of God was to show the manifold wisdom of God to the rulers and authorities (Ephesians 3:8-10). God’s plan was to eternally unite what once had been divided by an unjustified sinful attitude of pride and partiality. What hope Paul brought to the Gentiles who were once alienated from God and without hope! That’s why Jesus, the eternal Son of God, robed in Jewish flesh, had to pass through Samaria. The woman’s ethnicity was not a barrier for Jesus to extend grace and mercy. She was an image bearer of God, despite her sin, with inherent dignity and worth who needed a Savior. That is you. That is me. So why does this matter?

As I write this, the globe is in a state of unrest over the merciless and brutal killing of George Floyd, a Black man, by a Minneapolis police officer. Floyd’s death was preceded by Ahmaud Arbery’s and Breonna Taylor’s unjust murders, who also were both Black. Many are questioning if Black lives matter. Many are shouting, “Black lives matter!” This country’s history contains a narrative of dehumanizing and criminalizing Black skin and these recent murders are painful reminders of the “past”.

Without reservation, I boldly affirm the sentiment, Black lives matter, for two fundamental reasons. The first reason, which was stated in my previous article, is God intentionally created humanity in His image and likeness and therefore every person has inherent dignity and worth (Genesis 1:26-27). If we truly approached that truth with humility, by God’s grace and the Spirit’s work, we would be left speechless and the way we see and treat people would be radically different. C.S. Lewis once wrote, “There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal.Next to the Blessed Sacrament itself, your neighbor is the holiest object presented to your senses.”1

The second reason, which is the argument of this article, is God’s redemption of people in Christ from every tribe, language, people and nation. Throughout Scripture we don’t see God disparaging anyone because of their skin color or ethnicity. That would be anti-God, which is something he cannot be. To dehumanize, demoralize and show partiality toward a person on the basis of their God given distinctions is Satanic and heresy. Since there is nothing inherently sinful about one’s skin color or ethnicity, those cannot be barriers preventing the exercise of God’s redemptive grace and mercy toward us in Christ, the Jewish Messiah. This is what makes John’s vision so wonderful in Revelation 5:8-10; 7:9. Christ’s blood purchased a multi-ethnic, multilingual and multicultural people to the praise of His glory!

Considering these two truths, the church must lead the way with the gospel and its implications on all matters that pertain to human dignity and worth, especially in our current times of heightened racial injustice. Jesus purposed to pass through Samaria to love a social outcast. Unfortunately, it seems like some segments of the church do all they can to avoid loving their neighbor who is made in God’s image and their brother whom Christ shed His blood for. This ought not to be.

Now is the time for the church to walk worthy of the gospel with respect to the inherent dignity and worth of humanity. Will she be found faithful?

1. C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory, (HarperOne, 2001), pp. 45-46.

Dignity & Worth (pt. 1)

i-am-a-man

I wasn’t reaching for it.” Those were the last words he ever spoke. The last image his four year old daughter saw of her father was of him bleeding and losing consciousness. Less than a minute prior to the shooting he was pulled over for a non-working brake light. After complying with the officer showing his drivers license, he informed the officer that he was in possession of a firearm. “Ok. Ok . Don’t reach for it then. Don’t pull it out!” Dashcam footage reveals the officer reaching his arm into the car firing seven shots. The autopsy revealed two bullets ripped through Philando Castile’s heart on July 6, 2016. The officer, Jeronimo Yanez, was acquitted by a jury of second-degree manslaughter.

This horrific incident, unfortunately, wasn’t the first or the last of its kind. What some saw as an isolated incident, others saw as an incident of a centuries old narrative of racism against black people by people in positions of power. Botham Jean and Atatiana Jefferson are two recent examples of black people murdered by white police officers. What makes these two situations even more devastating was that they were murdered while in their homes in Texas. In each case respectively, the officers, who claimed they were acting in self defense, have been charged with and indicted for murder.

While I am familiar with the history of racism in America, the senseless killings over the last few years have affected me profoundly. At times, I have been filled with anger and other times I have had to fight to feel anything because it was becoming all too familiar. Another murder. Another share on social media. Another Tweet. The repetition and visual availability of such horror can have the ability to desensitize us to the tragedy of taking a human life. We need to be awakened to the reality of the preciousness of human life and to the horrors of ideas and actions that senselessly devalue and take human life.

We need to understand why stealing people from their native lands for selfish profit is wicked. We need to understand why transporting stolen people in cramped desolate and disease ridden ships is wicked. We need to understand why beating, raping and lynching stolen people is wicked. We need to understand why devaluing someone on the basis of their skin color is wicked.

FountainWe need to understand why restricting people from participating equally in society because of their skin color or sex is wicked. We need to understand why the existence of “colored” and “white” water fountains, etc. were so demoralizing and psychologically scarring. We need to understand why there was a need for the Civil Rights Movement. We need to understand why killing the unborn is wicked. We need to understand why sex trafficking of human beings is wicked. We need to understand why any malevolent treatment of human beings is utterly wicked. However, before we can truly understand why such treatment is evil, we must understand what it means to be human. Once we understand that, then we’ll understand the dignity and worth of each human being and seek ways to respond accordingly.

The Foundation
I am fully convinced that no other worldview or religion, other than Christianity, adequately or consistently explains the origin, essence and purpose of humanity. Scripture attests to the existence of God and His intentional creation of all things – including humanity. Genesis 1 provides us the account of God creating the heavens and the earth and the fullness thereof in six days. After five days of creating the heavens and the earth, God created man on the sixth day. Genesis 1:26-27 says –

26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.

From these verses, it is evident that God created man. But what we must not casually overlook is that man was created in the image and likeness of God and both male and female bear the image and likeness of God. The word man in verse 26 is the Hebrew word אָדָם (‘adam). While used as a proper noun as Adam, ‘adam is also a general Hebrew noun for mankind. Therefore, it is better to interpret man as mankind in these verses since verse 27 affirms that males and females bear the image of God.

Concerning the significance of image and likeness, former systematic theology professor and pastor, Anthony A. Hoekema said – 

Although these words are used generally as synonyms, we may recognize a slight difference between the two. The Hebrew word for image, tselem, is derived from a root that means “to carve” or “to cut”. It could therefore be used to describe a carved likeness of an animal or person. When it is applied to the creation of man in Genesis 1, the word tselem, indicated that man images God, that is, is a representation of God. The Hebrew word for likeness, demūth, comes from a root that means “to be like”. One could therefore say that the word demūth in Genesis 1 indicates that the image is also a likeness, “an image which is like us”. The two words together tell us that man is a representation of God who is like God in certain aspects.”1

It is worthy to note that no other part of creation was created in the image and likeness of God. This was reserved for mankind alone and that difference not only sets mankind apart from and above other creation, but gives him inherent dignity and worth. Nothing in all of creation resembles God like man. It is with respect to this unparalleled truth that God requires retribution for any man who sheds the blood of another man, who is made in the image of God. Genesis 9:6 says –

Whoever sheds the blood of man,
by man shall his blood be shed,
for God made man in his own image.

In the New Testament, James undergirds his argument for the ethical treatment of people with regard to speech utilizing the same language as Genesis 1:26-27. James 3:1-12 urges Christians not to use our tongues (speech) to curse people made in the likeness of God. The intentional language is not to be missed. The Spirit inspired writers of Genesis and James want us to feel the gravity of what it means to be human and the severity of the abuse of one who was purposely created in the image and likeness of God. In his relational, structural and functional capacities, man puts on display, although in a limited way, what God is like. That is a glorious reality! This is what it means to be human.

Based on this biblical truth, every human being without respect to age (even in utero- Ps. 139:13), sex, ethnicity, socio-economic status, etc., is an image bearer of the invisible God possessing inherent dignity and worth. It is because of this truth that people are to be treated with dignity, respect and value. Therefore, injustice, murder, rape, trafficking, racism, sexism, classism, abortion, abuse, and all forms of malevolent treatment of image bearers is out of step with God’s plan for how we are to view and treat one another, especially among professing Christians.

My Concern
Though chattel slavery and Jim Crow laws are no longer legal in America, because of Genesis 3, the sin of racism still exists and manifests in several other ways in society and, unfortunately, also in the church. Given the tense racial climate our country is presently experiencing, I have lamented at times at how inconsistent or seemingly apathetic certain segments of the church have been to address and even work out their salvation with respect to this segment of anthropology, which ultimately is a gospel issue (Jhn. 13:34-35; Eph. 2:11-22; 1 Jhn. 3:11-24).Unfortunately, this stain has been on the American church since the country’s inception and she is not without her justified critics.

In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Douglass stated:
“I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land.”

In A Letter From a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King, Jr. stated,
“I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate (white clergy). I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”

Douglass and King served as prophetic voices of indictment against the white evangelical. What’s painful to realize is that Douglass penned his words in 1845 and King penned his in 1963. One hundred eighteen years separate the two writings, but the same sin of racism permeated white evangelicals forcing blacks to defend their humanity, prove their dignity and worth time and time again and, at times, suffer death, in cases like the bombing of the the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham Alabama in 1963. Four Klansmen were found guilty of the bombing killing four young black girls. This ought not to have been.Birmingham4
Today, the church in America has made some progress, but not enough. We don’t need more public statements of confession, position papers, panel discussions, conferences, or books. We simply need the church to keep in step with the gospel by recognizing and treating all of mankind, who is created in the image and likeness of God, with dignity and worth. Since the church is the pillar and buttress of truth (1 Tim. 3:15), we are commanded not only to proclaim the truth, but to live it. We need more prophetic voices in pulpits who are unafraid of jeopardizing their ministries seeking to uphold the truths of Scripture. We need more concentrated efforts to understand minority issues. We need more gospel rooted efforts to diversify mainline seminaries’ faculties and student bodies. We need more qualified diverse leaders in mainline denominations at every level, especially in local churches. We simply need to walk worthy of the gospel toward our fellow image bearers due to the unity and love we have from Christ and in Christ.

Our orthodoxy must not be hollow, for such is not the way of our Savior.

 

 

1Anthony A. Hoekema, Created in God’s Image (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1994), 13.